Ea113 Industrial Multirotor Uav Power High-Torque Fpv Drone Motor

Name: Ea113 Industrial Multirotor Uav Power High-Torque Fpv Drone Motor
Brand: Nenggou (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2129048572

Beijing, ChinaNenggou (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd.

US$111.65

10-99 Piece

US$104.21

100-499 Piece

US$96.76

500+ Piece

Product specifications

KV Value

Product profile

Customization

Available

Certification

ISO9001, FCC, CE

Height

Ultra High-Altitude

Model NO.

EA113

Operating Radius

Remote

Size

Large

Usage

Industrial

Structure

Flapping-Wing UAV

Motor Kv

Kv100/Kv110

Dimensions

φ104*46.9mm

Structure Form

36n40p

Stator Core Size

φ96*20mm

Weight

860g

Spindle Diameter

φ12mm

Dynamic Balance Standard

≤10mg

Output Shaft Diameter

φ10mm

Motor Model

Ea113 Kv100

ESC Model

Foc 14s230A

Propeller Specification

40-Inch Folding Propeller (Up40132)

Applicable Models

Multi-Rotor Uav

Max Pull

30kg

Max Power

6.4kw

Test Lithium Battery

12s

Transport Package

Carton

Specification

860g

Trademark

OTHER

Origin

Guangdong Province, China

Key features

High Torque Performance: Max pull up to 30.1kg with 6.5KW max power output for industrial applications.

Advanced ESC System: Equipped with FOC 14S230A ESC for efficient and stable motor control.

Certified Quality: ISO9001, FCC, and CE certified ensuring compliance with international standards.

Customizable Specifications: Motor KV and dimensions can be customized to meet specific UAV requirements.

Company profile

Importers and ExportersMulti-language PioneerSelf-brandedPatents Awarded

Nenggou (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd.

Beijing, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/FactoryExport Year: 2024-02-15Nearest Port: Shenzhen Port, Tianjin Port, Ningbo PortAverage Response Time: ≤1.97hTerms of Payment: T/TInternational Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, DDP, CIF

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is identified as a trading company with business activities spanning technology services, energy storage, battery production and sales, battery-part production, and waste-power-battery recycling. It has documented procedures and records for supplier service assessment, corrective and preventive actions, and customer complaints. However, the supplied information shows no environmental impact assessment report, no OEM service for popular brands, and no overseas warehouse, showroom, agent, branch, or offline trade-show experience. Financial indicators reported for the stated periods are zero, which materially limits evidence of financial strength. The supplier has an available SDK, reported fire-drill activity, and stated production-related business scopes, but evidence is insufficient to confirm certifications, actual manufacturing scale, customization capability, or customer cases.

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly classified as a Trading Company and is not an offshore company. Its stated general scope covers technical services, development, consulting, exchange, transfer, and related technology activities.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier has written procedures and implementation records for service-capability assessment, corrective and preventive actions, and effective customer-complaint handling. These records provide explicit evidence of a structured after-sales and service-management process.

Financial creditReported operating revenue, operating cost, gross profit, gross margin, operating profit, and current-ratio figures are zero across the stated periods, including the most recent reported year. These figures do not provide evidence of financial strength and represent a significant financial credibility concern.

R&D capabilityThe supplier lists technology promotion, technology development and consulting, energy-storage technology services, and battery-related activities. It also explicitly has an available SDK, supporting evidence of software-related development capability, although no broader R&D performance data is provided.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly states that it does not provide OEM services for popular brands. No separate evidence establishes other customization services, so the available evidence indicates a deficiency for branded OEM customization.