200L Treble Cylinder Gasoline Petrol Belt Driving Air Compressor

Name: 200L Treble Cylinder Gasoline Petrol Belt Driving Air Compressor
Brand: Taizhou Boyu Trading Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2145785875

Zhejiang, ChinaTaizhou Boyu Trading Co., Ltd.

US$270.50

50-99 pcs

US$270.00

100-199 pcs

US$269.00

200+ pcs

Sample price:US$271.50/pcs.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

After-sales Service

Online Suport

Warranty

1 Year

Model NO.

SW-0.36/8-200S

Lubrication Style

Lubricated

Cooling System

Air Cooling

Cylinder Arrangement

Balanced Opposed Arrangement

Cylinder Position

Vertical

Structure Type

Open Type

Compress Level

Double-Stage

Refrigerant Type

Ammonia

Power

3kw

Wanrranty

1 Year

Pressure

0-8bar

Exhaust Volume(L/Min))

170

Motor Power(HP/Kw))

Type

200L

Speed(R/Min)

970

Cylinder(mm)

65*3

Place of Origin

China

Machinery Test Report

Provided

Marketing Type

Wholesale and DIY

Condition

New

Working Purssure

0-16

Gas Type

Air

After Warranty Service

No Service

Transport Package

Wodden Box

Specification

other

Trademark

YUBAO

Origin

Taizhou

HS Code

8414804990

Production Capacity

3000per Month

Company profile

Importers and ExportersHigh Repeat Buyers Choice

Taizhou Boyu Trading Co., Ltd.

Zhejiang, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service Available CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples, Customization from Designs CertifiedExport Year: 5 years CertifiedNearest Port: Ningbo Port, Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤7.54h

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is identified as a trading company with a broad scope covering machinery, equipment, tools, electronic components, material handling equipment, industrial automation devices, instruments, and certain chemical products. It has exported goods for five years and supports customization from samples and designs, but reported no new products launched in the past year. R&D resources appear limited: one R&D engineer, CAD capability, no patents, no available SDK, and no audit-ready R&D documentation. Service operations include one-month average lead times, six qualified service-capability suppliers, written service procedures with follow-up records, and FOB quotations, but there is no inventory, overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agent or branch, or overseas service coverage. Raw-material traceability, outsourcing controls, environmental documentation, fire-drill status, and financial performance cannot be adequately assessed from the provided information. No customer cases or...

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly classified as a trading company. Its registered business scope covers a broad range of machinery, equipment, components, tools, automation devices, instruments, and certain chemical products, indicating a diversified trading and sourcing model rather than documented manufacturing ownership.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier reports one-month average lead times in both peak and off-season periods, six qualified service-capability suppliers, written service procedures with followed records, and an updated approved-supplier list. However, it has no in-stock service capacity, overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agent or branch, and reports zero countries with overseas services, limiting documented overseas after-sales coverage.

R&D capabilityInnovation evidence is weak: no new products were launched in the past year, no SDK is available, there is only one R&D engineer, no R&D patents are reported, and no design input, output, review, verification, or validation documents are available for audit. CAD capability and design-customization responsibility are documented but do not offset the stated limitations.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from samples and from designs, with one R&D engineer responsible for design customization and CAD listed as an R&D software capability. Nevertheless, the absence of auditable R&D documentation and patents indicates that the depth and formal maturity of customization engineering are limited or unverified.