SummarySuzhou Qiantong Instrument Equipment Co., Ltd. is a China-based limited company established in 2014, operating in testing instruments and manufacturing machinery. The supplier reports ISO9001:2015 certification, 10 years of total R&D engineer experience, 7 production lines, and annual output of 1,000 universal material testing machines. Its product range includes universal, hydraulic, PV-solar, impact, melt-flow, and other testing machines. Export sales represent 21%–30% of total sales, and exporting began in 2015. The available data supports established manufacturing and product-development capabilities, but does not sufficiently verify after-sales service, customization, financial credibility, or customer cases. Trade records show limited recorded transactions in 2025, with destinations including Vietnam and Uzbekistan.
Supplier typeThe supplier is identified as Suzhou Qiantong Instrument Equipment Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited company engaged in manufacturing and selling testing machines and laboratory equipment. Its stated business activities cover instruments, meters, and manufacturing and processing machinery, indicating a manufacturer and seller rather than only a trading intermediary.
CertificationsThe supplier reports holding an ISO9001:2015 certificate. This is explicit evidence of a certified quality-management system, although the provided slices do not include the certificate number, issuing body, scope, or validity period.
R&D capabilityThe supplier reports 10 years of total R&D engineer experience and states that it emphasizes technology, pioneering, and innovation. Its portfolio includes multiple specialized testing-machine categories, but no patent, product-development record, laboratory, or verified innovation outcome is provided.
Production capacityThe supplier reports 7 production lines, a 1,200.0 m² manufacturing plant, 39 employees, and annual output of 1,000 universal material testing machines. These figures provide explicit evidence of operating manufacturing capacity, although the relationship between the reported employee count and quality-control staffing range is not clarified.