Second Hand Komatsu SAA6d102 Diesel Complete Engine Suitable for Excavator Forklift Loader

Name: Second Hand Komatsu SAA6d102 Diesel Complete Engine Suitable for Excavator Forklift Loader
Brand: Hefei Rongchen Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd
SKU: 2115374372

Anhui, ChinaHefei Rongchen Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd

US$2,000.00-7,000.00

1 unit

Product profile

Customization

Available

Ignition Mode

Electric Ignition

Speed

High Speed

Model NO.

Komatsu SAA6d102

Cooling Cylinder

Water-Cooled

Intake Pressure Impulse

Supercharged

Piston Movement

Reciprocating

Fuel

Diesel

Number of Strokes

4-Stroke

Cylinder Arrangement Form

Number of Cylinders

Inline 6-Cylinder

Type

Internal Combustion Engine

Engine Type

4-Stroke, Inline 6-Cylinder, Turbocharged

Displacement

6.3 L (6, 120 Cc)

Compression Ratio

17.5:1

Power Output

120 Kw (160 HP)

Torque Output

637 Nm (470 Lb-FT)

Fuel System

Direct Injection

Emission Standard

Tier 3 / Tier 4 Final / Stage V

Weight (Dry)

540 Kg

Aspiration

Turbocharged and Aftercooled

Bore X Stroke

102 mm × 120mm

Fuel Consumption

Approximately 200 - 210 G/Kwh (Depending on Load)

Transport Package

Wooden Package

Trademark

Komatsu

Origin

Japan

HS Code

8408100000

Production Capacity

50 Units/Months

Company profile

Importers and ExportersHigh Repeat Buyers ChoiceFast DeliveryLow MOQ

Hefei Rongchen Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd

Anhui, China

Business Type: Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service AvailableNearest Port: shanghai, qingdaoAverage Response Time: ≤6.22hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, PayPal, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, EXW, CIF, CFR

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is a limited company offering engines, excavators, hydraulic pumps, loaders, commercial vehicles, and related equipment. It operates one production line and reports fewer than five quality-control staff, while total staff experience is stated as zero, indicating limited documented production depth. Service strengths include a complaint-handling procedure with records, quality assurance in quality-control processes, multiple quotation and payment options, and a one-month lead time in both peak and off-seasons. However, it has no overseas showroom, agents, branches, or reported overseas-service countries. Financial credibility cannot be positively established because the provided financial figures are all zero. R&D documentation, SDK availability, new-product development, and formal supplier-service assessment procedures are absent, although ODM and several customization services are offered. No customer cases are explicitly provided.

Supplier typeThe supplier is identified as a limited company and is not part of a larger corporate group. Its stated product scope covers industrial and commercial equipment, including engines, excavators, hydraulic pumps, loaders, vehicles, forklifts, buses, and cranes.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier has a clear customer-complaint procedure with follow-up records, and technology engineers are responsible for customer-request confirmation and after-sales technical support. However, it has no overseas showroom, agents, branches, or overseas-service coverage, and lacks written corrective-action and supplier-service assessment procedures.

R&D capabilityThe supplier has technology engineers supporting customer requirements and offers ODM services, but no SDK is available, no new products were reported in the past year, and R&D design-input, output, review, verification, and validation documents are unavailable for audit. This shows some service-oriented technical capability but weak documented innovation evidence.

Production capacityThe supplier operates one production line and has fewer than five quality-control staff, with annual production output reported below the stated threshold. It reports a one-month average lead time in both peak and off-seasons, but the limited production-line and staffing data does not demonstrate strong manufacturing capacity.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from designs, flexible customization, minor customization, and ODM services. This is direct evidence of multiple customization options, although no supporting R&D documentation is available for audit.