Brown Kraft Paper Stand up Tea Pouch with Window

Name: Brown Kraft Paper Stand up Tea Pouch with Window
Brand: GUANGZHOU RICHER IMPORT AND EXPORT TRADE CO.,LTD.
SKU: 908115435

Guangdong, ChinaGUANGZHOU RICHER IMPORT AND EXPORT TRADE CO.,LTD.

US$0.02-0.09

50,000 Pieces

Sample price:US$0.00/piece.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Application

Food

Material

Paper, Kraft Paper

Model NO.

2021 food paper bag

Feature

Moisture Proof, Bio-Degradable, Disposable

Bag Variety

Upright Bag

Shape

Stand up Bag

Raw Materials

Kraft Paper

Transport Package

in Carton

Specification

Customized size

Trademark

Richer

Origin

China

Production Capacity

1000000 Per Month

Company profile

Importers and ExportersHigh Repeat Buyers ChoiceCooperated with Fortune 500Experienced Team

GUANGZHOU RICHER IMPORT AND EXPORT TRADE CO.,LTD.

Guangdong, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading CompanyExport Year: 2004-01-01Average Response Time: ≤5.87hTerms of Payment: T/TInternational Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is a paper manufacturer with stated annual production capacity of 40,000 tons and 25 years of papermaking experience. Its product scope includes rolling, kraft, food-packing, machine-glazed, typewriter, and carbonless base papers. It reports export experience of 9 years, with 71%–90% of sales from exports, although exports are conducted through agents and no overseas branches, showrooms, or offline trade-show participation are reported. The supplier provides OEM, ODM, 3D design, and multiple customization options, and states that it introduced new products in the past year. It reports cooperation with Fortune 500 companies. Service procedures exist for corrective actions and customer complaints, but written records are absent; quality assurance status is unknown. Certification information is limited to “Others,” so specific compliance certifications cannot be confirmed. Financial records are referenced for multiple years, but financial performance cannot be assessed from the provided information.

Supplier typeThe supplier’s stated products are primarily paper products, including white cigarette rolling paper, kraft paper, food-packing paper, machine-glazed paper, typewriter paper, and carbonless base paper. Its description also states annual production capacity of 40,000 tons and 25 years of papermaking experience, supporting classification as a paper manufacturer.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier has procedures for corrective and preventive actions and customer complaints, but no written records are available. It has no overseas showroom, overseas agent or branch service capability, and reports zero countries with overseas services; therefore, formal procedures exist but international after-sales coverage is limited.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports new products within the past year and offers 3D software design, ODM, and OEM services. It does not have an available SDK, but the stated product-development and design capabilities provide explicit evidence of innovation support.

Production capacityThe supplier states production capacity of 40,000 tons per year, 25 years of papermaking experience, and quality inspection from raw material through packing. Lead-time information is inconsistent across the records—within 15 working days off-season and one month during peak season in one slice, versus 2–3 months during peak season in another—so capacity is demonstrated but delivery performance is not fully consistent.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from samples, customization from designs, full customization, minor customization, flexible customization, 3D software design, ODM, and OEM services for popular brands. These multiple stated service modes indicate broad customization capability.

Client casesThe supplier states that it has collaborated with Fortune 500 companies. No company names, project details, products supplied, or performance evidence are provided, so the existence of a claimed reference is supported but its quality and relevance cannot be independently assessed.