High Cost-Performance Apple-Style Design Bluetooth Wireless Half in-Ear Semi in-Ear Earphone

Name: High Cost-Performance Apple-Style Design Bluetooth Wireless Half in-Ear Semi in-Ear Earphone
Brand: Roman Technology Co., Ltd
SKU: 1971899311

Guangdong, ChinaRoman Technology Co., Ltd

US$1.96-2.40

1,000 Pieces

Sample price:US$1.96/piece.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Style

Half in Ear

Usage

Mobile Phone, MP3 & MP4, Computer

Model NO.

T46

Bluetooth Version

Bluetooth 5.3

Soundtrack

Dual Track

Function

Bluetooth

Characteristics

Voice Control

Color

White

Specifications

A2DP

Distance version

Class B

Service

OEM ODM

Chipset

Jl6983 V5.3

Profile

Avdtp/Avrcp/A2dp

Charging Port

Type C

Frequency

2.402-2.480GHz

Music Time

3-5h

Talking Time

3-5h

Standby Time

100h

Charging Time

Headset Battery

25mAh*2

Charging Base Battery

180mAh

Transmission Distance

10m

MOQ

1000PCS

Transport Package

Box

Trademark

Customized

Origin

Guangdong, China

HS Code

8517629400

Production Capacity

100000pieces/Months

Company profile

ODM ServicesOEM ServicesYears of Export ExperienceExhibition Experience

Roman Technology Co., Ltd

Guangdong, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service Available CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples, Customization from Designs, etc. CertifiedExport Year: 12 years CertifiedNearest Port: Shenzhen PortAverage Response Time: ≤15h

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryROMAN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD demonstrates substantial product development, customization, export, OEM, and manufacturing capabilities. It reports new-product activity, ODM services, multiple customization options, OEM service for known brands, participation in major overseas trade shows, and stated monthly production capacity exceeding one million units. However, the evidence does not establish certification holdings, financial strength, or formal quality-assurance status. The supplier has no overseas showroom, overseas agents or branches, overseas warehouse, or in-stock service capability. Raw-material traceability and several manufacturing-control procedures are also unresolved. Customer evidence is limited to named product/order records and one associated buyer, so customer-case depth cannot be fully assessed.

Supplier typeThe supplier presents itself as a manufacturer with R&D, ODM, OEM, and smart-manufacturing capabilities. Its product records cover styling irons, curling irons, and hair-dryer parts, while the stated manufacturing description includes production, testing, and shipping activities.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier reports no overseas showroom, overseas agents or branches, overseas warehouse, or in-stock service capability. Although it has attended offline trade shows, the evidence does not establish an effective after-sales network or complaint-resolution process; complaint handling is recorded only as “Others.”

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports new products within the past year, provides ODM services, and maintains a product R&D institute. It also describes continuous technology exploration and process optimization, although no SDK is available.

Production capacityThe supplier states that it has standardized processes from raw-material procurement through final testing and shipping and monthly production capacity exceeding one million units. However, it reports no in-stock capability, no overseas warehouse, and unresolved status for capacity reconciliation, outsourcing procedures, and manufacturing contracts.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from samples, designs, full customization, minor customization, and flexible customization. This range is directly supported in two slices and indicates broad customization coverage.

Client casesThe supplier reports OEM service for known brands and provides product/order records for styling irons, curling irons, and hair-dryer parts. One associated buyer, ELIN APPLIANCES PRIVATE LIMITED, is identified, but the evidence is too limited to establish the scale or breadth of its customer portfolio.