Factory Best Price Ethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether (EE) CAS No. 111-76-2

Name: Factory Best Price Ethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether (EE) CAS No. 111-76-2
Brand: Henan Ruidea Industry Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2052160172

Henan, ChinaHenan Ruidea Industry Co., Ltd.

US$2.00-2.50

5 kg

Sample price:US$100.00/kg.Request sample

Product profile

CAS No.

111-76-2

Formula

C4h10o2

EINECS

203-804-1

Model NO.

99.5%

Aldehyde

Fatty Aldehyde

Aether

Aliphatic Ethers

Hydroxybenzene

Polyphenol

Ketone

Saturated Ketone

Transport Package

190kgs/Drum

Specification

99.5% 190kgs/drum

Trademark

Origin

China

HS Code

2909430000

Production Capacity

10000mts/Year

Key features

High Purity Grade: Purity reaches 99.5% minimum as verified by GC analysis.

Versatile Industrial Solvent: Ideal for leather, paint, ink, resin, and textile industries.

Free Sample Testing: Free samples provided for quality testing; buyer pays freight.

Fast Production Cycle: Production typically completed within 10 days after order confirmation.

Transparent Process: Detailed process updates provided during production and delivery.

Flexible Payment Terms: Supports T/T 30% advance, 70% before delivery, LC, PayPal, etc.

Global Delivery Options: Offers FOB, CIF, EXW, and DAP terms to serve worldwide markets.

Expert Product Selection: Custom recommendations based on specific industry requirements.

Company profile

High Repeat Buyers Choice

Henan Ruidea Industry Co., Ltd.

Henan, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading CompanyExport Year: 2024-04-08Average Response Time: ≤4.63hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, PayPal, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, EXW, CIF, DAP

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryHenan Ruidea Industry Co., Ltd. is a China-based limited company identified as both a trading company and manufacturer/factory, offering zirconium chemicals, nano materials, fine chemicals, and sanitation trucks. Its stated production capacities include zirconium oxychloride, zirconium carbonate, zirconium sulphate, zirconium dioxide, and nano zirconium dioxide. The supplier reports 13 employees and 6–10 quality-control staff, with exports to multiple global regions. It provides design-based customization, but reports no ODM service, no OEM service for popular brands, no available SDK, and no new products launched in the past year. Supplier-service procedures, corrective-action records, and complaint-handling procedures were not documented. SGS audit information is provided, but the slices do not identify a certification held or a successful audit outcome. Financial records are referenced for 2021–2023, but the available information does not establish financial strength. No customer cases are provided.

Supplier typeThe supplier is identified as a limited company based in Henan, China, and is classified as both a trading company and manufacturer/factory. Its stated product scope includes zirconium chemicals, nano materials, fine chemicals, and sanitation trucks, while another slice identifies it as a trading company selling chemical and other goods.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier has no written procedures or records for effective service assessment, corrective and preventive actions, or customer complaint handling. This is explicit evidence of a deficiency in documented after-sales and service-management capability.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no new products launched in the past year, no ODM service, and no available SDK. These stated limitations indicate weak demonstrated innovation and R&D-related capability for the requested criteria.

Production capacityThe supplier reports annual capacities of 50,000 tons of zirconium oxychloride, 6,000 tons of zirconium carbonate, 5,000 tons of zirconium sulphate, 4,000 tons of zirconium dioxide, and 1,000 tons of nano zirconium dioxide. It is identified as a manufacturer/factory and reports exports to regions including North America, Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania, and South America, supporting production and market-delivery capability.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from designs. However, it does not provide ODM service, so the evidence supports design-based customization but not broader product-development or ODM capability.