Versatile 80 Ton Mobile Crane Ztc801vs562 for Heavy Lifting Projects

Name: Versatile 80 Ton Mobile Crane Ztc801vs562 for Heavy Lifting Projects
Brand: Nantong Haoshi Engineering Machinery Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2237810765

Jiangsu, ChinaNantong Haoshi Engineering Machinery Co., Ltd.

US$155,000.00

1-2 Pieces

US$138,000.00

3+ Pieces

Product profile

Customization

Available

After-sales Service

Remote Warranty

Warranty

1 Year

Model NO.

ZTC801VS562

Certification

GS, RoHS, CE, ISO9001

Condition

New

Maximum Lifting Height

67.2m

Maximum Lifting Weight

80000kg

Shaft Number

Crane Jib

Five-Arm

Type

Telescopic

Max. Load Moment of Basic Boom

3450 kN·M

Max. Travel Speed

89 Km/H

Max. Gradeability

48%

Slewing Speed

0 ~ 1.6 R/Min

Transport Package

Nude Packing

Specification

14800*3000*3910mm

Trademark

Top Brand

Origin

China

HS Code

8426411000

Production Capacity

1000 Sets/Year

Company profile

Low MOQQuality AssuranceQA/QC InspectorsFast Delivery

Nantong Haoshi Engineering Machinery Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

Business Type: Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service Available CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from SamplesExport Year: 2024-01-31Nearest Port: shanghai, tianjin, qingdaoAverage Response Time: ≤2.13h

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is a limited trading company with 10 employees and no stated affiliation with a larger group. It sells and repairs mechanical and specialized packaging equipment and reports OEM and ODM service availability, supported by two R&D engineers. However, the supplier has no valid import/export license, no overseas warehouse, showroom, agent, or branch, and no overseas service coverage is recorded despite describing technical after-sales activities. Service, complaint-handling, corrective-action, traceability, and R&D documentation are largely undocumented or absent. Quality assurance is stated, but no quality-control testing equipment is reported. No recent new product development, SDK, or verified certification information is provided. The supplier reports OEM service for well-known brands, but no specific customer cases are identified.

Supplier typeThe supplier is identified as a limited company and trading company, with a business scope covering mechanical equipment sales, specialized packaging equipment sales, specialized equipment repair, and gas sales. It has 10 employees and no stated affiliation with a larger company group.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier lists debugging, maintenance, repair, training, and equipment installation services and states that it provides technical support through the after-sales systems of three major host manufacturers. However, it reports zero countries with overseas services, no overseas warehouse, showroom, agent, or branch, while service procedures, complaint handling, corrective actions, and supporting records are undocumented.

Financial creditThe provided financial records show zero operating revenue, operating cost, gross profit, and operating profit for the stated periods. These figures indicate no demonstrated operating financial performance in the supplied records, although the information does not independently establish the supplier's overall solvency.

R&D capabilityThe supplier has two R&D engineers and reports sample provision, new-product research, and technical support, as well as ODM availability. Nevertheless, it reports no new products during the past year, no available SDK, no R&D audit documentation, and no design input, output, review, verification, or validation records.

Production capacityThe supplier's stated business scope emphasizes sales and repair rather than manufacturing, and it is classified as a trading company. Quality assurance is reported, but there are zero quality-control test equipment items, no raw-material traceability identification, and only limited checking records maintained by storage staff.

Customization capabilityThe supplier reports ODM service and states that its two R&D engineers provide samples according to customer requirements, which supports some customization capability. However, no structured R&D documentation or SDK is available, so the breadth and technical maturity of customization cannot be fully verified.