2rows 3rows Adjustable Row Spacing with Fertilizer Box Machine Corn Seeder Maize Planter

Name: 2rows 3rows Adjustable Row Spacing with Fertilizer Box Machine Corn Seeder Maize Planter
Brand: Shandong Msang Machinery Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2068477342

Shandong, ChinaShandong Msang Machinery Co., Ltd.

US$670.00

1-9 Pieces

US$650.00

10-99 Pieces

US$630.00

100+ Pieces

Product profile

After-sales Service

Have

Application

Corn

Application Field

Agriculture, Livestock, Aquaculture, Forestry

Model NO.

bgyf-3

Function

Sowing

Planting Machine Type

Planting Machine

Fertilizing Machine Type

Full-size Fertilizer

Power Source

Tractor

Mechanization

Semi-Automatic Planting Machine

Ditching Mode

Continuous Ditching

Sowing

Broadcast Seeder

Condition

New

Warranty

1year

Rows

Sowing Depth

50-100mm

Line Spacing

500-620mm

Plant Spacing

120-320mm

Power

20HP

Weight

85kg

Transport Package

Wooden Box

Specification

890kg

Origin

Shandong

Company profile

Multi-language PioneerExperienced TeamLow MOQ100% Finished Products Inspection

Shandong Msang Machinery Co., Ltd.

Shandong, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedCustomization Options: Full Customization, Flexible customization, etc. CertifiedExport Year: 4 years CertifiedNearest Port: Qingdao PortAverage Response Time: ≤2.96h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryHightop is identified as a combined company engaged in construction engineering machinery, wood and bamboo processing machinery, hydraulic machinery and components, agricultural and forestry machinery, general equipment, parts, hardware, and electromechanical product sales. It reports ISO 9001, CE, SGS, TUV, and BV certifications, plus patents, trademarks, and copyrights. However, the available evidence shows significant service and process limitations: no valid manufacturing-capacity contract with affiliated subcontractors, no inventory, overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agents, or branches; no overseas service coverage; and no participation in offline trade shows. Lead times are stated as within 15 working days in both peak and off-season, but supplier-management, corrective-action, complaint-record, and traceability documentation is incomplete or absent. ODM, branded OEM, and SDK-supported R&D services are unavailable. Financial records are indicated for 2021–2023, but no financial...

Supplier typeThe supplier is classified as a combined company, with stated activities spanning construction engineering machinery, hydraulic machinery and components, agricultural and forestry machinery, general equipment, parts, hardware, and electromechanical products. This indicates a manufacturer and trader with a diversified industrial scope.

CertificationsThe company explicitly reports ISO 9001, European Union CE, SGS, Germany TUV, and France BV certifications. It also states that quality is a core objective and reports 28 national patents, 21 trademarks, and 3 copyrights, providing positive evidence of formal certification and documented intellectual-property activity.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier has no overseas warehouse, showroom, overseas agent or branch, or overseas service coverage, and reports no offline trade-show participation. Although it accepts multiple payment and quotation terms, states lead times within 15 working days, and has a complaint-handling procedure, it lacks written corrective-action procedures and records, has no approved supplier list, and has incomplete complaint documentation.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports 28 national patents, 21 trademarks, and 3 copyrights and describes technological innovation as a company priority. Nevertheless, it does not provide ODM services or an available SDK, so the evidence supports internal innovation activity but not flexible external R&D integration.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly does not provide ODM services, does not perform OEM for popular brands, and has no available SDK. Quality assurance is reported, but absent traceability identification and undocumented corrective and preventive actions further limit evidence of controlled customization capability.