Cheap 180 Degree High Temp Mold Release Wax Made in China

Name: Cheap 180 Degree High Temp Mold Release Wax Made in China
Brand: SFT Industries Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2187952555

Jiangsu, ChinaSFT Industries Co., Ltd.

US$10.00-20.00

1 kg

Sample price:US$0.00/kg.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Application

Plastic Auxiliary Agents, Coating Auxiliary Agents

Color

Yellowish

Model NO.

customized

Form

Solid Wax

Hardness

Medium

Main Ingredients

Carnauba Wax

Melting Point

Above 100℃

Packaging

Drum

Purity

100% Purity

Classification

Chemical Auxiliary Agent

Type

Adsorbent

Characteristic

High Heat Resistance

Storage

Shady Place Indoor

Raw Materials

From Germany

Appearance

Solid

The Boiling Point

185 Degree

Flash Point

60 Degree

Water Soluble

Insoluble

Odor

No Irritant Smell

Transport Package

Cans, Drums & Pallets

Specification

OEM

Trademark

OEM

Origin

China

HS Code

3404900090

Production Capacity

10 Tons/Month

Company profile

High Repeat Buyers ChoiceIn-stock CapacityOEM ServicesQuality Assurance

SFT Industries Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service Available CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples, Customization from Designs, etc. CertifiedExport Year: 8 Years CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤4.74h

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is identified as a trading company in Changzhou, with business activities covering textiles, clothing, furniture, ships, cosmetics, protective equipment, and import/export services. It holds an ISO9001:2015 certificate and reports OEM service for well-known brands. The supplier offers sample-, design-, and minor-customization services, has CAD capability, three production lines, six to ten quality-control staff, and stated output across several product categories. Export experience is eight years, with exports representing 51%–70% of total sales and markets including Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Europe, and domestic customers. Key limitations are the absence of R&D audit documentation, zero reported patents, no SDK, no overseas agents, branches, warehouse, or showroom, no offline trade-show participation, no valid manufacturing-capacity contract with related subcontractors, and no written inspection or service-capability records. Financial evidence is insufficient for assessment.

CertificationsThe supplier reports holding an ISO9001:2015 certificate for its management system. This is explicit evidence of certification and supports a positive assessment for formal quality-management-system recognition.

After-Sales capabilityR&D responsibilities include providing samples and after-sales service, and the supplier reports a service-capability supplier pool of 10 qualified suppliers. However, its assessment procedure has no written procedures or followed records, so the existence of service support is evidenced but systematic management is not fully demonstrated.

R&D capabilityThe supplier has one R&D engineer, uses CAD, and reports no R&D patents, no available SDK, and no design input, output, review, verification, or validation documents available for audit. These records show limited documented innovation capability, but zero patents alone does not prove a complete lack of innovation.

Production capacityThe supplier reports three production lines, six to ten quality-control staff, in-stock capability, and stated output for FRP tools, paint rollers, fasteners, Kevlar fiber, and carbon fiber. Lead times are within 15 working days in both peak and off-season, but there is no valid manufacturing-capacity contract with the factory and related subcontractors, and finished-product inspection has instructions without written records.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from samples, customization from designs, and minor customization, and reports OEM services for well-known brands. CAD capability further supports design execution, although the absence of R&D audit documentation limits evidence of a formal development process.