Wool Roller Sleeves for Epoxy Resin Painting 40mm X 100mm

Name: Wool Roller Sleeves for Epoxy Resin Painting 40mm X 100mm
Brand: SFT Industries Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2066637945

Jiangsu, ChinaSFT Industries Co., Ltd.

US$0.10-0.50

100 Pieces

Sample price:US$0.00/piece.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Type

Roller Brush

Wire Material

Wool/Acrylic/Polyester/Cotton

Model NO.

40 x 100mm

Shape

Long

Usage

Industrial Brushes, FRP/Fiberglass

Application

FRP Resin Application

Color

Colorful

Customized

Condition

New

Inner Diameter

15mm

Outer Diameter

40mm

Length

100mm/150mm/200mm Customized

Hair

Short/ Long

Handle

Plastic

Pole

Zinc Plated

Length of Handle

26cm, 36cm, 41cm Customized

Color of Handle

Black/Blue/Orange/Yellow/Wooden

Package

Plastic Bag&Carton&Pallet

Transport Package

Carton&Pallet

Specification

40*100mm/150mm/200mm

Trademark

SFT

Origin

China

HS Code

96034020

Production Capacity

1000000PCS/Year

Company profile

High Repeat Buyers ChoiceIn-stock CapacityOEM ServicesQuality Assurance

SFT Industries Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service Available CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples, Customization from Designs, etc. CertifiedExport Year: 8 Years CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤7.75h

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is identified as a trading company in Changzhou, with business activities covering textiles, clothing, furniture, ships, cosmetics, protective equipment, and import/export services. It holds an ISO9001:2015 certificate and reports OEM service for well-known brands. The supplier offers sample-, design-, and minor-customization services, has CAD capability, three production lines, six to ten quality-control staff, and stated output across several product categories. Export experience is eight years, with exports representing 51%–70% of total sales and markets including Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Europe, and domestic customers. Key limitations are the absence of R&D audit documentation, zero reported patents, no SDK, no overseas agents, branches, warehouse, or showroom, no offline trade-show participation, no valid manufacturing-capacity contract with related subcontractors, and no written inspection or service-capability records. Financial evidence is insufficient for assessment.

CertificationsThe supplier reports holding an ISO9001:2015 certificate for its management system. This is explicit evidence of certification and supports a positive assessment for formal quality-management-system recognition.

After-Sales capabilityR&D responsibilities include providing samples and after-sales service, and the supplier reports a service-capability supplier pool of 10 qualified suppliers. However, its assessment procedure has no written procedures or followed records, so the existence of service support is evidenced but systematic management is not fully demonstrated.

R&D capabilityThe supplier has one R&D engineer, uses CAD, and reports no R&D patents, no available SDK, and no design input, output, review, verification, or validation documents available for audit. These records show limited documented innovation capability, but zero patents alone does not prove a complete lack of innovation.

Production capacityThe supplier reports three production lines, six to ten quality-control staff, in-stock capability, and stated output for FRP tools, paint rollers, fasteners, Kevlar fiber, and carbon fiber. Lead times are within 15 working days in both peak and off-season, but there is no valid manufacturing-capacity contract with the factory and related subcontractors, and finished-product inspection has instructions without written records.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from samples, customization from designs, and minor customization, and reports OEM services for well-known brands. CAD capability further supports design execution, although the absence of R&D audit documentation limits evidence of a formal development process.