Best Selling Higher Quality Real Mink Lashes with Packaging

Name: Best Selling Higher Quality Real Mink Lashes with Packaging
Brand: Juancheng Simon Eyelash Co., Ltd.
SKU: 745519272

Shandong, ChinaJuancheng Simon Eyelash Co., Ltd.

US$2.20-3.50

1 Piece

Sample price:US$3.50/pair.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Terrier

Cotton Terrier

Usage

Daily, Festival, Emulation, Television, Ragdoll

Model NO.

mink eyelashes

Technics

Hand Made

Color

Black

Material

Mink Hair

Weight

1-2g/Pair

Reuseful

Yes (20-25 Times with Proper Care)

Customized Lashes

Yes (Should Provide Sample)

Package Specification

Single Box, 2 in 1, 5 in 1, 10 in 1 Package Box

Package Choose

Plstick Case;Customized Logo Box; Round Box

Transport Package

Customized Package Box or Regular Box

Specification

12 * 6 * 1.5cm

Trademark

your own brand

Origin

China

HS Code

6704190000

Production Capacity

20000pairs/Month

Company profile

High Repeat Buyers ChoiceIn-stock CapacityFast DeliveryR&D Capabilities

Juancheng Simon Eyelash Co., Ltd.

Shandong, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading CompanyExport Year: 2012-04-28Nearest Port: qingdao, shanghaiAverage Response Time: ≤24hTerms of Payment: T/T, PayPal, Western Union, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, CFR, CIF

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryJuancheng Simon Eyelash Co., Ltd. is a China-based private limited company in Shandong that is identified as both a trading company and manufacturer/factory, although another record classifies it as a trading company. It offers eyelashes, makeup brushes, cosmetics, packaging, tools, and hair extensions. The supplier reports extensive customization and ODM services, OEM service for well-known brands, new products within the past year, and ISO 9001 and QC 080000 certifications. Export sales account for 90%, with nine years of export experience and broad international markets. Production information lists substantial stated eyelash output and 6–10 quality-control staff. However, records conflict on employee count, with one stating two total employees, and the supplier reports no available SDK. Evidence is insufficient for after-sales capability and financial credibility. R&D engineer experience is under five years, so innovation activity is demonstrated but depth is limited.

Supplier typeThe supplier is legally presented as a Chinese limited company and privately owned, with records identifying it as both a trading company and manufacturer/factory; a separate record classifies it only as a trading company. This indicates mixed supplier-type information, but manufacturing capability is explicitly claimed.

CertificationsThe supplier reports holding ISO 9001 and QC 080000 management-system certifications. These are explicit certifications relevant to quality and hazardous-substance control, although no certificate scope or validity details are provided.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports new products within the past year and offers ODM services, while its R&D-related design services include full, flexible, sample-based, and design-based customization. However, it reports no available SDK and total R&D engineer experience under five years, so innovation capability is demonstrated but not strongly evidenced as advanced.

Production capacityThe supplier identifies itself as a manufacturer/factory and provides stated annual output across mink, synthetic, individual, horse, and 3D mink eyelashes, along with 6–10 quality-control staff. However, the separate record states only two total employees, creating a material workforce inconsistency; production capability is nevertheless explicitly claimed.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from samples and designs, full, minor, and flexible customization, as well as ODM services. Its description also states that lashes and packaging can use the customer’s private logo and brand name and that products can be duplicated from customer samples.

Client casesThe supplier reports providing OEM services for well-known brands, which is an explicit customer-experience claim. No brand names, project details, volumes, or independently verifiable case studies are provided, so the evidence supports experience but not detailed case validation.