What is the lead time for orders?

Peak season lead time is one month, while off-season lead time is within 15 workdays.

What materials are used to make the paper?

The paper is crafted from 100% premium imported virgin wood pulp.

What payment terms are accepted?

We accept LC, T/T, D/P, Western Union, and Money Gram.

High Quality Double Sided Silicone Baking Paper for Outdoor Grills and Cooking

Name: High Quality Double Sided Silicone Baking Paper for Outdoor Grills and Cooking
Brand: Huizhou Sprui New Material Technology Co., Ltd
SKU: 2127153382

Guangdong, ChinaHuizhou Sprui New Material Technology Co., Ltd

US$0.35

8,000 Bags

Product profile

Customization

Available

Industrial Use

Food

Transparency

Opaque

Layered

Basic Level

Hardness

Soft

Packaging

Bag

Bag Sealing Methods

Flat Bag Packaging

Specification

customized

Trademark

Sprui

Origin

China

Key features

High Heat Resistance: Withstands temperatures up to 230 degrees Celsius for safe grilling and baking.

Premium Material: Crafted from 100% imported virgin wood pulp for superior quality.

Multiple Certifications: Certified by ISO9001, BRC, SEDEX, KOSHER, LFGB, and FDA.

Customizable Options: OEM/ODM available with customizable sizes and colors.

High Production Capacity: Monthly output of 2500 tons with advanced coating and cutting machines.

Versatile Coating: Available in single or double-sided food-grade silicone oil coatings.

Non-Stick Performance: Features greaseproof and waterproof properties for easy food release.

Flexible Packaging: Options include plastic ziplock bags, PE coated paper, or pallet packing.

Company profile

Quality AssuranceRaw-Materials Traceability100% Finished Products InspectionManagement Certification

Huizhou Sprui New Material Technology Co., Ltd

Guangdong, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service Available CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from SamplesExport Year: 2024-11-01Nearest Port: Shenzhen, GuangzhouAverage Response Time: ≤3.08h

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier presents itself as a silicone-coated paper provider with ISO9001:2015 certification and documented procedures for supplier service assessment, corrective actions, complaint handling, and finished-product inspection. It reports 6–10 quality-control staff, but only one year of R&D-engineer experience and no patents, private-mold capability, professional technical-supplier status, 3D design, SDK, or recent new-product development. Customization from samples, ODM, and OEM services are available. Overseas infrastructure is limited: no overseas warehouses, showrooms, agents, branches, or offline trade-show participation, and exports account for only 1%–10% of sales. Production scale, capacity, and customer references are not sufficiently documented. Financial information is present but is not assessed here because monetary figures are excluded.

CertificationsThe supplier explicitly reports an ISO9001:2015 certificate and states that its products or operations are associated with ISO9001, HACCP, FDA, and LFGB certifications. However, the slices do not provide certificate numbers, validity dates, scopes, or issuing bodies for the additional certifications.

After-Sales capabilityDocumented procedures and records exist for service-capability assessment, corrective and preventive actions, and customer complaints. However, the supplier has no overseas warehouse, showroom, agent, branch, or overseas service country, indicating limited international after-sales infrastructure.

R&D capabilityInnovation evidence is weak: the supplier reports one year of total R&D-engineer experience, no R&D patents, no private-mold or 3D-design capability, no SDK, and no new product in the past year. It does report ODM capability and says it invests in R&D, but the concrete capability data does not demonstrate strong innovation performance.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from samples and ODM services, and reports OEM capability for popular brands. These statements support practical product customization, although no evidence is provided regarding private molds, 3D design, or broader engineering resources.