HDPE Material Soft Plastic Baby Ocean Ball

Name: HDPE Material Soft Plastic Baby Ocean Ball
Brand: Shandong Foison International Trade Co., Ltd.
SKU: 1938333051

Shandong, ChinaShandong Foison International Trade Co., Ltd.

US$0.0001-0.001

1 Piece

Sample price:US$0.01/piece.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Material

Application

Household, Toy

Model NO.

201469823

Certification

ISO

Name

Plastic Ball Pit Balls

Type

Beach Ball

Style

Soft Toy

MOQ

10000 PCS

Model Number

F63023

Usage

Pool Kids Play

Size

38-130mm

Color

Colorful

Certificate

CCC/ISO

Age Range

0 to 24 Months, 2 to 4 Years, 5 to 7 Years, 8 to 1

Shape

Round Shape

Payment Term

Transport Package

OPP Packaging

Specification

38mm-130mm

Trademark

FOISON

Origin

China

Production Capacity

500000 Pieces/Month

Company profile

Importers and ExportersIn-stock CapacityQuality AssuranceRaw-Materials Traceability

Shandong Foison International Trade Co., Ltd.

Shandong, China

Business Type: Trading CompanyExport Year: 2021-05-01Nearest Port: Qingdao PortAverage Response Time: ≤4.06hTerms of Payment: T/T, D/P, PayPal, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, EXW, CFR, CIF, DAT, FAS, DDP, DAP, CIP, CPT, Others, FCA

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier operates a production facility in Ningyang County, Shandong, with seven production lines and reported annual production of approximately 1,900–2,100 tons from 2018–2022. It holds TS 16949 and ISO 9001 certifications, and reports quality assurance and raw-material traceability. Its capabilities include minor customization and customization from samples, but it reports no new products in the past year, no ODM service, and no SDK. Overseas support is limited: it has no overseas agents, branches, warehouse, showroom, or offline trade-show participation. Quality corrective-action and complaint-handling procedures are undocumented. The supplier reports export markets across Eastern Europe, the Middle East, North America, Western Europe, and Africa, but no customer-specific cases or named brands are provided. Financial information is incomplete and includes zero reported profit figures, so financial credibility cannot be established from the available data.

Supplier typeThe supplier is associated with a manufacturing facility equipped with heat-treatment equipment, grinding machines, and a refining mill, operates seven production lines, and reports production measured in tons. Its stated business scope also includes various sales and consulting activities, but the provided evidence supports classifying it primarily as a manufacturer with additional trading or service activities.

CertificationsThe supplier reports holding TS 16949 and ISO 9001 certifications. These are explicit quality and automotive-sector management certifications, providing positive evidence of formal management-system certification.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier has no overseas agents, branches, warehouse, or showroom, and reports no written procedures or records for handling customer complaints or corrective and preventive actions. Although it reports quality assurance, the evidence does not demonstrate a robust after-sales service system.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no new products during the past year, no ODM service, no SDK availability, and total R&D engineer experience below five years. These statements indicate limited documented innovation resources and output.

Production capacityThe supplier reports seven production lines, annual production of 1,900–2,100 tons from 2018–2022, and a network of 11 qualified suppliers. It also reports delivery within 15 working days off-season and one month during peak season, although another slice contains an inconsistent and unclear lead-time entry. Overall, the evidence supports established production capacity, while planning and supplier-management documentation appear limited.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly provides minor customization and customization from samples. However, it does not provide ODM services, so the evidence supports limited or moderate customization rather than full product-development outsourcing.