Durable Prefabricated Steel Workshop Design for Global Buyers

Name: Durable Prefabricated Steel Workshop Design for Global Buyers
Brand: Qingdao Xinguangzheng Sino Building Co., Ltd
SKU: 2012243912

Shandong, ChinaQingdao Xinguangzheng Sino Building Co., Ltd

US$60.00

500 Square Meters

US$25.00

501+ Square Meters

Product profile

Customization

Available

After-sales Service

Yes

Characteristics Of Goods

Customized

Model NO.

XGZ-Warehouse

Type

Multi-Storey Warehouse

Company Nature

Public Company

Delivery Time

Normally 30-45 Days After Shop Drawing Approved

Payment Term

T/T, L/C

Surface Treatment of Steel Structure

Painted or Galvanized

Software

CAD, Tekla, Sketchup, Pkpm, Bim

Staffs

1000+

Workshop

Engineer

100+

Material

Steel Structure

Usage

Temporary Offices, Workshop, Shed, Hangar, Prefab

Certification

ISO, CE, SGS, BV

Customized

Warranty

Yes

Transport Package

Steel Pallet

Specification

Steel grade Q345B& Q235

Trademark

XGZ

Origin

Qingdao, China

HS Code

940690

Production Capacity

100, 000 Tons Per Year

Company profile

Qingdao Xinguangzheng Sino Building Co., Ltd

Shandong, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading Company, Group CorporationExport Year: 2022-04-27Nearest Port: QingdaoAverage Response Time: ≤3.78hTerms of Payment: LC, T/TInternational Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, EXW, CFR, CIF

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is identified as a Qingdao-based trading company with business activities covering hardware components, EPS products, mechanical equipment, steel structure material processing, and related engineering installation. It reports customization from designs, samples, and flexible or minor customization, but lacks 3D software design, ODM, SDK, and recent new-product development capabilities. Production and fulfillment capacity show material limitations: no valid manufacturing contract with related subcontractors, no inventory, overseas warehouse, showroom, agent, or branch. Quality assurance and raw-material traceability are reported, while corrective-action and complaint procedures lack written records. Financial information is indicated for multiple years, but the provided slices do not disclose measurable financial results, so credibility cannot be determined. No certification, customer case, or completed offline trade-show evidence is provided.

Supplier typeThe supplier is classified as a trading company and its associated-company industry is manufacturing. Its stated scope includes hardware components, EPS products, mechanical equipment, steel structure material processing, and steel structure engineering installation, indicating a trading-oriented entity connected to manufacturing-related activities.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier reports no overseas agents or branches, overseas warehouse, showroom, or in-stock service capability. It has procedures for corrective and preventive actions and customer complaints, but no written records; therefore, formal after-sales processes exist but their demonstrated effectiveness and overseas coverage are limited.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no new products in the past year, no ODM service, no SDK availability, no popular-brand OEM capability, and no professional technical R&D capability. It also does not provide 3D software design services, indicating limited documented innovation resources.

Production capacityThe supplier has no valid manufacturing-capacity contract with its related subcontractor, no inventory capability, and no overseas fulfillment infrastructure. Its stated scope includes material processing and engineering installation, and it reports one-month average lead times in both peak and off-seasons, but the missing manufacturing contract materially limits confirmation of production reliability.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from designs, full customization, flexible customization, customization from samples, and minor customization. Quality assurance and raw-material traceability are also reported, although the absence of written corrective-action records limits evidence of process maturity.