Is a free sample available?

Yes, free samples are provided for this product.

Dow Corning 993n Two Component Structural Glazing Sealant

Name: Dow Corning 993n Two Component Structural Glazing Sealant
Brand: Shanghai Sunway Curtain Material Co., Ltd.
SKU: 840929815

Shanghai, ChinaShanghai Sunway Curtain Material Co., Ltd.

US$2,800.00

1,000-9,999 Pieces

US$2,785.00

10,000+ Pieces

Sample price:US$10.00/piece.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Bonding Material

Aluminum

Shelf Life

12 Month

Model NO.

993n

Cartridge

300ml

Sausage

590ml

Carton

24 Piece in One Carton

OEM

Yes

Sample

Free Sample

Type

Sealant

Seal Tape Usage

Engineering

Material

Composite Materials

State

Dynamic Seal

Mildew Proof

Seal Tape Kind

Silicone

Transport Package

Cartridge

Specification

300ml

Trademark

SUNWAY

Origin

China

HS Code

3214109000

Production Capacity

1000000

Key features

Structural Glazing Certification: Meets ASTM C719, C1184, ETAG002, and GB16776-2005 standards for structural silicone sealants.

Low VOC & Easy Tooling: Formulated with low VOC content for environmental safety and allows for easy tooling during application.

Long Shelf Life: Provides a 14-month shelf life without requiring lot matching of components.

OEM Customization Available: Supports OEM services with customizable cartridge sizes including 300ml and 590ml options.

Strong Adhesion Properties: Offers excellent unprimed adhesion to glass, alodine, and anodized metals for structural applications.

Fast Lead Time: Offers off-season lead time within 15 workdays and peak season lead time of one month.

Company profile

Shanghai Sunway Curtain Material Co., Ltd.

Shanghai, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading CompanyExport Year: 2016-07-04Nearest Port: ShanghaiAverage Response Time: ≤15hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, PayPal, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, CFR, CIF, EXW

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryShanghai Sunway Curtain Material Co., Ltd. is identified as both a trading company and manufacturer/factory in China, supplying silicone sealants, adhesives, polyurethane foam, and related construction chemicals. The available evidence indicates established operations since 2005, export activity since 2016, broad international market coverage, ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certifications, and substantial stated production resources, including multiple production lines, quality-control staff, and R&D engineers. However, the slices contain no sufficient evidence of after-sales service processes, customization arrangements, or specific customer cases. Production figures are inconsistent across the provided descriptions, so capacity should be verified before reliance.

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly classified as both a trading company and manufacturer/factory. Its factory is stated to be in Quzhou, Zhejiang, while the company is registered and addressed in Shanghai; the company description also identifies it as a silicone sealant manufacturer founded in 2005.

CertificationsThe supplier explicitly reports ISO 14001 and ISO 9001 certification for its management systems. These certifications support environmental and quality-management capability, although the slices do not provide certificate numbers, validity dates, or scope.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports 11–20 years of R&D engineer experience, eight product series with more than 30 varieties, and applications spanning construction, automotive, machinery, electronics, electrical appliances, and solar photovoltaic products. These details support product-development breadth, but no specific patents, new-product achievements, or R&D outcomes are stated.

Production capacityThe supplier reports silicone sealant productivity of 100,000 tons, eight production lines, 21–30 quality-control staff, a factory in Zhejiang, and lead times of within 15 workdays off-peak and one month during peak season. Another company description states 12 automated production lines and annual capacity of 20,000 tons, creating a material inconsistency that should be verified, although the overall evidence still indicates established manufacturing capability.