How are the cabbages packaged?

They are packed in 100% recyclable ventilated corrugated cartons with eco-friendly moisture-proof inner liners.

Do you provide export documentation?

Yes, we provide full official export documents including phytosanitary certificates.

Who bears the import tariffs and taxes?

All import tariffs and local taxes incurred at the destination are undertaken solely by the buyer.

Crunchy Green Cabbage for Delicious Slaws and Wraps

Name: Crunchy Green Cabbage for Delicious Slaws and Wraps
Brand: Tianjin Yujie Fengling Trading Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2178260512

Tianjin, ChinaTianjin Yujie Fengling Trading Co., Ltd.

US$499.00

15 Tons

Product specifications

Class I grade

Product profile

Customization

Available

Certification

ISO, HACCP

Packaging Material

Paper

Model NO.

cabbage4

Storage Method

Protect from Light

Color

Green

Cultivation Type

Common

Kind

Fresh

Transport Package

Carton

Specification

Class I grade

Origin

China

HS Code

0704901000

Production Capacity

99999999

Key features

Tight & crisp leaves with uniform fresh green color, no insect holes or cracks, perfect for raw salad and stir-fry

Long shelf life under cold chain, resistant to rot and damage during long-distance transport

Farm direct hand-sorted cabbage, pesticide residue meets global standards, bulk supply for export supermarkets

Company profile

High Repeat Buyers ChoiceFast DeliveryLow MOQImporters and Exporters

Tianjin Yujie Fengling Trading Co., Ltd.

Tianjin, China

Business Type: Trading Company CertifiedExport Year: 1 year CertifiedNearest Port: Tianjin PortAverage Response Time: ≤3.42h CertifiedTerms of Payment: T/T CertifiedInternational Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, CIF, CFR, EXW

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is engaged in food sales, including edible oil, alongside a broad range of retail and trading activities. It reports flexible customization and export capability, with exports representing 71%–90% of total sales and self-operated import/export rights. Reported lead time is one month in both peak and off-peak seasons, with quotation terms of FOB, CIF, and CFR. However, the supplier has limited documented technical and quality infrastructure: one R&D engineer, no patents, no available SDK, no R&D audit documentation, and no quality-control test equipment. After-sales and corrective-action processes lack written procedures or records. Financial records are indicated for 2022–2024, but no financial results are provided. No certifications, customer cases, or verified environmental and fire-safety documentation are identified.

Supplier typeThe supplier appears to be a food and general trading company, with edible oil identified as its production category and food sales limited to pre-packaged products. Its business scope also includes household goods, apparel, office supplies, appliances, and other retail products, indicating a diversified trading and retail profile rather than a narrowly specialized manufacturer.

R&D capabilityInnovation infrastructure is limited in the available evidence: there is one R&D engineer, no patents, no available SDK, and no design input, output, review, verification, or validation documents available for audit. The engineer’s stated responsibility is packaging customization, which supports limited product-development support but not broad innovation capability.

Production capacityThe supplier reports edible-oil output of 25,000,000 tons and one-month fulfillment times in both peak and off-peak seasons, with export terms including FOB, CIF, and CFR. However, the data also reports zero quality-control test equipment and weak documented service and quality procedures, so production scale is stated but production-control capability is a material concern.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly lists customization from designs, full customization, minor customization, and flexible customization. Its one R&D engineer is responsible for customizing product packaging according to customer needs, providing direct support for packaging-related customization, although the absence of R&D audit documentation limits verification of broader customization execution.