How long is the lead time?

The average lead time is one month for both peak and off-peak seasons.

What is the standard size of the tissue roll?

The standard size is 150mm*180mm.

Eco-Friendly Large Pack Facial Tissues for Everyday Needs

Name: Eco-Friendly Large Pack Facial Tissues for Everyday Needs
Brand: Tianjin Yujie Fengling Trading Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2178259052

Tianjin, ChinaTianjin Yujie Fengling Trading Co., Ltd.

US$2.00

3,000 Pieces

Product specifications

normal

Product profile

Customization

Available

Layer

4ply

Core

Coreless

Paper Net Content

>200g/roll

Flavor

Without Flavor

Pattern

Without Pattern

Material

Virgin Wood Pulp

Style

Box

Color

White

Size

Standard Roll

Disposable

Yes

Transport Package

Soft Plastic Tissue Bag

Specification

150mm*180mm

HS Code

4818200000

Production Capacity

9999999999

Key features

Premium Material: Made of 100% virgin wood pulp for superior softness and strength.

4-Ply Design: Thickened 4-ply construction ensures durability and lint-free performance.

Skin Friendly: Fragrance-free and without fluorescent agents, safe for babies and sensitive skin.

Space Saving: Hanging bottom-draw design saves counter space and reduces paper waste.

Retail Ready: Sealed in printed laminated plastic bags, ready for supermarket display.

Custom Packaging: Custom carton logo printing and adjustable packing quantities available.

Company profile

High Repeat Buyers ChoiceFast DeliveryLow MOQImporters and Exporters

Tianjin Yujie Fengling Trading Co., Ltd.

Tianjin, China

Business Type: Trading Company CertifiedExport Year: 1 year CertifiedNearest Port: Tianjin PortAverage Response Time: ≤3.41h CertifiedTerms of Payment: T/T CertifiedInternational Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, CIF, CFR, EXW

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is engaged in food sales, including edible oil, alongside a broad range of retail and trading activities. It reports flexible customization and export capability, with exports representing 71%–90% of total sales and self-operated import/export rights. Reported lead time is one month in both peak and off-peak seasons, with quotation terms of FOB, CIF, and CFR. However, the supplier has limited documented technical and quality infrastructure: one R&D engineer, no patents, no available SDK, no R&D audit documentation, and no quality-control test equipment. After-sales and corrective-action processes lack written procedures or records. Financial records are indicated for 2022–2024, but no financial results are provided. No certifications, customer cases, or verified environmental and fire-safety documentation are identified.

Supplier typeThe supplier appears to be a food and general trading company, with edible oil identified as its production category and food sales limited to pre-packaged products. Its business scope also includes household goods, apparel, office supplies, appliances, and other retail products, indicating a diversified trading and retail profile rather than a narrowly specialized manufacturer.

R&D capabilityInnovation infrastructure is limited in the available evidence: there is one R&D engineer, no patents, no available SDK, and no design input, output, review, verification, or validation documents available for audit. The engineer’s stated responsibility is packaging customization, which supports limited product-development support but not broad innovation capability.

Production capacityThe supplier reports edible-oil output of 25,000,000 tons and one-month fulfillment times in both peak and off-peak seasons, with export terms including FOB, CIF, and CFR. However, the data also reports zero quality-control test equipment and weak documented service and quality procedures, so production scale is stated but production-control capability is a material concern.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly lists customization from designs, full customization, minor customization, and flexible customization. Its one R&D engineer is responsible for customizing product packaging according to customer needs, providing direct support for packaging-related customization, although the absence of R&D audit documentation limits verification of broader customization execution.