No. 283, Fangba Rd., Central Zone, Teda, Tianjin Heavy-Duty Wire Solar Panel Cable

Name: No. 283, Fangba Rd., Central Zone, Teda, Tianjin Heavy-Duty Wire Solar Panel Cable
Brand: Inner Mongolia Zhengbiao Jinda Cable Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2156722212

Inner Mongolia, ChinaInner Mongolia Zhengbiao Jinda Cable Co., Ltd.

US$0.24-29.08

500 Meters

Product specifications

H1Z2Z2-K

Product profile

Customization

Available

Application

Telecommunication

Material Shape

Round Wire

Model NO.

H1Z2Z2-K

Sheath Material

Halogen-Free Low Smoke Xlpo

Insulating Material

Halogen-Free Low Smoke Xlpo

Conductor Type

Tinned Copper

Brand

Jinda Cable

Certification

CCC

Wire Core Material

Tinned Copper

Sample

Available

Color

Customized

Executive Standard

En 50618:2014

Certifications

TUV Rheinland

Transport Package

Specification

4.4-230kg

Trademark

JINDA CABLE

Origin

No. 283, Fangba Rd., Central Zone, Teda, Tianjin

Company profile

Cooperated with Fortune 500Importers and ExportersHigh Repeat Buyers ChoiceQuality Assurance

Inner Mongolia Zhengbiao Jinda Cable Co., Ltd.

Inner Mongolia, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples, Customization from Designs, etc. CertifiedExport Year: 5 years CertifiedNearest Port: Ningbo Port, Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤6.55h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier demonstrates broad customization and design-service capabilities, with stated capacity for customization from samples, designs, full customization, flexible customization, and minor customization. It reports 30 production lines, in-stock capability, eight qualified service suppliers, and lead times within 15 working days in both peak and off-season periods. Quality inspection instructions are available and uniformly followed. However, the supplier reported no new products in the past year, no ODM, no SDK, and no OEM service for popular brands. Manufacturing controls have notable gaps: no valid contracts with related subcontractors, no ongoing batch quantity reconciliation, and no outsourcing standard operating procedure. Service procedures exist for complaints and corrective actions with records, but the supplier assessment procedure has no records. Financial information is inconsistent or insufficiently substantiated, with multiple reported zero values; financial credibility therefore cannot...

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier has clear procedures and followed records for handling customer complaints and for corrective and preventive actions. Its supplier-service assessment procedure is written but has no records, so after-sales capability is supported but not fully evidenced across all service controls.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no new products in the past year, no ODM service, and no available SDK. These are explicit limitations in product-development and technical-platform capability.

Production capacityProduction-related evidence includes 30 production lines, in-stock capability, eight qualified suppliers, instructions uniformly followed for finished-product inspection, and lead times within 15 working days in both peak and off-season. Nevertheless, the absence of ongoing quantity reconciliation, an outsourcing SOP, and valid subcontractor contracts creates control weaknesses, so overall production strength is mixed.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly provides customization from samples and designs, full customization, flexible customization, and minor customization. This is consistent across both design-service records and demonstrates broad customization coverage.