Reliable Rvv Flat Twin Parallel Cable with Class 5 Copper Conductivity

Name: Reliable Rvv Flat Twin Parallel Cable with Class 5 Copper Conductivity
Brand: Inner Mongolia Zhengbiao Jinda Cable Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2197313032

Inner Mongolia, ChinaInner Mongolia Zhengbiao Jinda Cable Co., Ltd.

US$0.59

500 Meters

Sample price:US$0.59/meter.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Type

Rvv

Conductor Type

Solid

Model NO.

RVV 2*2.5

Application

Home Decoration, Construction

Conductor Material

Copper

Sheath Material

PVC

Insulation Material

PVC

Material Shape

Flat Wire

Range of Application

Home Decoration, Construction

Certification

ISO9001, CE, CCC

Brand

Jinda

Conductor

Class 5 Multi-Strand Flexible Bare Copper

Minimum Bending Radius

≥10 × Cable Thickness

Cable Shape

Flat Twin Parallel

Rated Voltage

300/500V AC

Transport Package

Customization

Specification

2*2.5

Trademark

JINDA

Origin

China

Company profile

Cooperated with Fortune 500Importers and ExportersHigh Repeat Buyers ChoiceQuality Assurance

Inner Mongolia Zhengbiao Jinda Cable Co., Ltd.

Inner Mongolia, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples, Customization from Designs, etc. CertifiedExport Year: 5 years CertifiedNearest Port: Ningbo Port, Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤7.37h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier demonstrates broad customization and design-service capabilities, with stated capacity for customization from samples, designs, full customization, flexible customization, and minor customization. It reports 30 production lines, in-stock capability, eight qualified service suppliers, and lead times within 15 working days in both peak and off-season periods. Quality inspection instructions are available and uniformly followed. However, the supplier reported no new products in the past year, no ODM, no SDK, and no OEM service for popular brands. Manufacturing controls have notable gaps: no valid contracts with related subcontractors, no ongoing batch quantity reconciliation, and no outsourcing standard operating procedure. Service procedures exist for complaints and corrective actions with records, but the supplier assessment procedure has no records. Financial information is inconsistent or insufficiently substantiated, with multiple reported zero values; financial credibility therefore cannot...

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier has clear procedures and followed records for handling customer complaints and for corrective and preventive actions. Its supplier-service assessment procedure is written but has no records, so after-sales capability is supported but not fully evidenced across all service controls.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no new products in the past year, no ODM service, and no available SDK. These are explicit limitations in product-development and technical-platform capability.

Production capacityProduction-related evidence includes 30 production lines, in-stock capability, eight qualified suppliers, instructions uniformly followed for finished-product inspection, and lead times within 15 working days in both peak and off-season. Nevertheless, the absence of ongoing quantity reconciliation, an outsourcing SOP, and valid subcontractor contracts creates control weaknesses, so overall production strength is mixed.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly provides customization from samples and designs, full customization, flexible customization, and minor customization. This is consistent across both design-service records and demonstrates broad customization coverage.