Advanced Textile Lab Equipment for Button Impact Testing

Name: Advanced Textile Lab Equipment for Button Impact Testing
Brand: Uts International Co., Ltd
SKU: 2186674505

Fujian, ChinaUts International Co., Ltd

US$100.00-400.00

1 Set

Product profile

Customization

Available

Warranty

12 Months

Usage

Textile Fabric Testing, Appearance Quality Testing

Model NO.

M063B

Automatic Grade

Manual

Appearance Quality Testing Machine Type

Button Impact Tester

Fabric Style Testing Machine Type

Button Impact Tester

Technological Characteristic Testing Machine Type

Button Impact Tester

Textile Fabric Testing Machine Type

Button Impact Tester

Universal Textile Testing Machine Type

Button Impact Tester

Certification

Condition

New

After-sales Service

12 Months

Weight

3kg

Certificate

CE, ISO 17025

Standards

GB/T 22704-2008

Button Impact Tester

Impact Head

0.84kg(29.5oz.)

Transport Package

Standard Export Wooden Case

Specification

260X150X250mm

Trademark

UTSTESTER

Origin

China

HS Code

90248000

Company profile

Importers and ExportersHigh Repeat Buyers ChoiceExhibition ExperienceProduct Certification

Uts International Co., Ltd

Fujian, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading CompanyExport Year: 2016-08-05Nearest Port: XIAMEN, SHANGHAI, SHENZHENAverage Response Time: ≤2.22hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, EXW, CFR, CIF, DDP, DAP, CIP, CPT, FCA

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is a China-based limited company operating as both a trading company and manufacturer/factory in instruments and meters. It holds an import/export license and reports broad export markets, but has only 9 employees and no cooperative suppliers listed. Certification evidence includes CE and stated compliance of testing instruments with multiple international standards, with calibration certificates available upon request. After-sales and service governance appear weak because no written procedures or records are reported for service assessment, corrective actions, or complaint handling, and the supplier has no overseas showroom, agents, or branches. Innovation evidence is mixed: the supplier reports ongoing R&D and improvement efforts, but only one R&D engineer, no new products launched in the past year, and no available SDK. Financial information is limited to reporting years rather than financial results, so credibility cannot be determined.

Supplier typeThe supplier is identified as a limited company and trading company, while another record also classifies it as a manufacturer/factory. Its stated business scope covers sales and technical services for instruments and intelligent basic manufacturing equipment, and it holds a valid import/export license. The available information supports a trading-led supplier with reported manufacturing capability, but does not establish the scale of its own factory operations.

CertificationsThe supplier reports CE certification capability and states that its testing instruments are designed and produced according to standards including ISO, ASTM, EN, DIN, JIS, GB, BS, SATRA, ANSI, TAPPI, AATCC, IEC, CE, and ISO 17025. It also states that CNAS calibration certificates can be provided upon request. These claims provide explicit certification and standards evidence, although the specific scope and validity of each certificate are not provided.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier states that it is improving pre-sales and after-sales services and reports relationships with global testing organizations, but it also reports no written procedures or records for service assessment, corrective/preventive actions, or complaint handling. It has no overseas showroom, agents, or branches, offers overseas services in zero countries, and only confirms participation in ITMA 2019. The explicit service-control deficiencies outweigh the general service statements.

R&D capabilityThe supplier states that it continues research, development, innovation, and improvement activities, and reports 6–10 total years of R&D engineer experience. However, the detailed data lists only 1 R&D engineer, no new products launched in the past year, and no available SDK. These explicit limitations prevent a positive assessment of current innovation output.

Production capacityThe supplier is classified as both a trading company and manufacturer/factory, reports annual production output in a stated range, and operates in instruments and meters. However, it has only 9 total employees and lists zero cooperative suppliers, with no detailed production equipment, facility, or capacity evidence. The stated production-output information supports capability, but its operational scale cannot be fully validated.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly reports flexible customization as a design-services capability. This directly supports the ability to adapt products or designs to customer requirements, although no examples, technical scope, or delivery conditions are provided.