Inkjet Date Printing Machine, Inkjet Expiry Date Printing Machine

Name: Inkjet Date Printing Machine, Inkjet Expiry Date Printing Machine
Brand: GUANGZHOU YALIAN COSMETIC MACHINERY EQUIPMENT CO., LIMITED
SKU: 1922204265

Guangdong, ChinaGUANGZHOU YALIAN COSMETIC MACHINERY EQUIPMENT CO., LIMITED

US$568.00

1 Piece

Product profile

Customization

Available

After-sales Service

Ten Years Main Technical Support

Warranty

2years

Model NO.

YMS

Type

Continuous Jet Type Coding Machine

Usage

Daily Industrial, Chemical Products, Drug, Food, Cosmetics, Chemical, Pharm, Food, Beverage

Automatic Grade

Fully Automatic

Principle of Classification

Continue Ink Jet Printer

Application of Classification

High Resolution Ink Jet Printer

Working Patterns

On-Line

Supplies

Ink

Packaging

Box

Name

Inkjet Date Printing Machine,Inkjet Expiry Date Pr

Printer Speed

High Speed 0-60b/,Min

Voltage

110-220V

Print Dimension

1-4lines

Printing Content

Number, Text, Time, Date, Bar Code, Qr Code, Varia

Certification

CE,RoHS,FCC

Ink Color

Black and White

Weight

60kg

Transport Package

Carton Box

Specification

550*550*650MM

Trademark

Yalian

Origin

Guangzhou

HS Code

8443393100

Production Capacity

60-80set/Month

Company profile

GUANGZHOU YALIAN COSMETIC MACHINERY EQUIPMENT CO., LIMITED

Guangdong, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading Company, Group CorporationExport Year: 2018-08-01 CertifiedNearest Port: Guangzhou PortAverage Response Time: ≤7.20h CertifiedTerms of Payment: T/T, PayPal, Western Union CertifiedInternational Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, CIF, CFR

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryGuangzhou Yalian Cosmetic Machinery Equipment Co., Limited is a China-based trading company established in 2018, with five employees and a stated 260.0 m² manufacturing plant. Its product scope includes cosmetic mixing, homogenizing, filling, capping, labeling, packaging, and water-treatment equipment. The supplier claims integrated research, development, production, sales, and service activities, core homogenizing technology, a quality-management system, five production lines, and annual output of 100 sets for mixing tanks and vacuum homogenizer mixers. It reports export activity since 2018 and exports representing 51%–70% of sales. Customer-service and international market claims are present, including service to customers in multiple countries, but certification evidence, independently verifiable customer references, and detailed customization capabilities are not provided. The available trade records show one transaction for each of two listed products with one buyer in Sri Lanka.

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly classified as a Trading Company and Limited Company, while its profile also describes research, development, production, sales, and service of cosmetic machinery. Its stated business scope includes industrial equipment, packaging machinery, and related sectors, but the available information does not establish that it is primarily a manufacturer rather than a trading company.

After-Sales capabilityThe company describes an integrated sales-and-service model, states that its equipment services have reached thousands of customers, and mentions service to customers across Europe, the Americas, and Asia. However, no specific warranty, maintenance process, response-time commitment, spare-parts arrangement, or service organization is stated.

R&D capabilityThe supplier explicitly claims research and development activities, ownership of homogenizing core technology after eight years of development, and an ongoing cosmetics-machine design effort. It also identifies vacuum homogenizer mixers, liquid mixing tanks, and filling machines as developed equipment, supporting a positive innovation assessment.

Production capacityEvidence includes a stated 260.0 m² manufacturing plant, five production lines, annual productivity of 100 sets for mixing tanks and vacuum homogenizer mixers, and a quality-control staffing figure of 21–30. These claims indicate production capability, although the unusually larger quality-control headcount relative to the five total employees reported elsewhere creates an unresolved data inconsistency.

Client casesThe supplier claims to have provided equipment services to thousands of customers in countries including Germany, the United Kingdom, the United States, Poland, Brazil, Japan, South Korea, Kenya, and South Africa. The available transaction evidence directly identifies only one buyer, JANET LANKA PVT LTD, in two separate listed transactions, so the broader customer-case claim is not independently substantiated within the provided records.