Premium Fire Door and Window Bonding Sealant for Safety

Name: Premium Fire Door and Window Bonding Sealant for Safety
Brand: Zibo Chico International Co., Ltd.
SKU: 788842352

Shandong, ChinaZibo Chico International Co., Ltd.

US$1.33

6,000-59,999 ml

US$1.26

60,000+ ml

Sample price:US$50.00/box.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Color

White

Material

Composite Materials

Model NO.

DJ-A3-MF889F-25

Thickness

3mm

Usage

Interior Doors

Type

Sealant

State

Fluid

Mildew Proof

Bonding Material

Glass

Seal Tape Kind

Organic Material

Seal Tape Usage

Fire Doors and Windows

Transport Package

Carton

Specification

592ml / 20 pcs/box

Trademark

SILANDE

Origin

China

HS Code

3506919010

Production Capacity

50000PCS/Years

Key features

Fire Door & Window Sealing: Specifically designed for bonding and sealing fireproof doors, windows, and curtain wall gaps.

Excellent Adhesion: Strong bonding to glass, aluminum, stainless steel, and coated surfaces without primer.

High Elasticity & Modulus: Features high mechanical properties and elasticity to withstand structural movement.

Mildew Proof & Waterproof: Resistant to ozone, moisture, and mildew, suitable for humid and public environments.

Solvent-Free Formula: One-component, non-fogging, and environmentally friendly with no pollution.

Fast Curing & Neutral: Neutral fast curing process that does not corrode adhered surfaces.

Certified Standards: Complies with GB 16776, GB/T 2406, and EU EN1279 standards.

Company profile

Zibo Chico International Co., Ltd.

Shandong, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading CompanyExport Year: 2010-04-02 CertifiedNearest Port: Qingdao PortAverage Response Time: ≤3.70h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc. CertifiedInternational Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, CIF, CFR, EXW

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryZibo Chico International Co., Ltd. is identified as a China-based trading company established in 2015, with three employees and an address in Zibo, Shandong. Its profile covers glass and building-material products, including pads, sealants, spacer bars, machinery, and desiccants. The submitted information also describes a manufacturing site in Zhengzhou with more than 10 production lines, 50 quality-control staff, and stated output capacities, although these manufacturing details are not clearly reconciled with the company’s trading-company classification and small employee count. No supplier management-system certifications are reported. The company claims broad export coverage, 90% export sales, overseas agents or distributors, and order fulfillment within 15 working days in both peak and off-peak periods. R&D resources appear limited, with one year of R&D-engineer experience. Trade records show one transaction associated with Ukraine and one with Colombia in 2025; these records provide limited evidence...

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly classified as a Trading Company and is registered as a Limited Company in China. Its stated business identity is therefore primarily commercial/intermediary rather than directly identified as a manufacturer.

CertificationsSupplier management-system certification is explicitly reported as NIL. Although the company states that selected brands have certified quality and that certain sealants are approved by IFT Rosenheim, this does not establish that the supplier itself holds management-system certifications.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier describes consultancy, transportation, and local service support, and states that it works through overseas agents or distributors in multiple countries. These statements indicate an available support network, but no specific warranty, repair, complaint-handling, or service-level details are provided.

Production capacityThe profile states more than 10 production lines, 50 quality-control staff, a 50.0 m² manufacturing plant, and output capacities for sponge, silicone sealant, and cork pads, with fulfillment within 15 working days in both peak and off-peak seasons. However, the manufacturing information is not clearly consistent with the stated trading-company classification and three total employees, so capability is evidenced but should be verified.