Triethylamine for Industrial Organic Intermediate

Name: Triethylamine for Industrial Organic Intermediate
Brand: Zibo Wan Hong Sheng Chemical Technology Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2187598082

Shandong, ChinaZibo Wan Hong Sheng Chemical Technology Co., Ltd.

US$1,700.00-1,900.00

1 Ton

Sample price:US$1700.00/ton.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

CAS No.

121-44-8

Formula

C6h15n

Model NO.

Triethylamine

EINECS

204-469-4

Classification

Aliphatic Amine

Grade Standard

Industrial Grade

Whether Ring Formation or Not

Aliphatic Hydrocarbon

Whether Containing Benzene Ring

No Benzene Ring Contained

Fat Hydrocarbon Saturation

Saturated Aliphatic Amine

Transport Package

140kg Galvanized Iron Drum

Specification

140kg galvanized iron drum

Trademark

Zibo Wan Hong Sheng Chemical Technology Co., Ltd.

Origin

China

Key features

Diverse Packaging Options: Available in 200kg drums, IBC tote tanks, and ISO tank containers.

Fast Delivery Lead Time: Normally 7-10 working days after receiving advance payment.

Comprehensive Documentation: COA and MSDS documents available upon request for all products.

Safe International Shipping: Exported from Qingdao Port with standardized packaging meeting safety standards.

Customization from Samples: OEM service available with customization options based on customer samples.

Strict Compliance: Qualified for hazardous chemicals operation in strict compliance with national regulations.

Flexible Payment Terms: Accepts LC, T/T, D/P, PayPal, and Western Union for international trade.

Company profile

High Repeat Buyers ChoiceFast DeliveryR&D Capabilities

Zibo Wan Hong Sheng Chemical Technology Co., Ltd.

Shandong, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: OEM Service Available CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples CertifiedExport Year: less than 1 year CertifiedNearest Port: Qingdao PortAverage Response Time: ≤2.03h

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryZibo Wan Hong Sheng Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based trading company established in December 2024 with four employees and no stated affiliation with a larger group. Its business scope covers chemicals, additives, materials, fertilizers, and related products, but the supplied information does not establish in-house manufacturing. The supplier reports OEM service for well-known brands and sample-based customization, but does not provide ODM services or an SDK and launched no new products in the past year. Operational controls are weak or undocumented: there are no written complaint-handling procedures, no quality-control test equipment, and no written supplier-service assessment or corrective-action procedures. It has no inventory, overseas warehouse, showroom, overseas agent, or branch capability. Export experience is reported as less than one year, and no valid import/export license is stated. Financial information is present for several periods, but the slices do not provide sufficient...

After-Sales capabilityAfter-sales and service controls appear deficient: the supplier has no written customer-complaint procedures or records, no written service-capability assessment or corrective-action procedures, and no inventory, overseas warehouse, showroom, overseas agent, or branch. These explicit gaps indicate limited documented support capability.

R&D capabilityInnovation capability is limited by the explicit absence of ODM service, absence of an available SDK, no new products launched during the past year, and only one R&D engineer. These findings indicate weak demonstrated product-development capacity.

Production capacityThe business scope includes many chemical, additive, material, and fertilizer sales activities, but the supplier is identified as a trading company and no manufacturing facilities, production lines, output capacity, or workforce for production are provided. Quality-control test equipment is explicitly recorded as zero, further weakening evidence of in-house production capability.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly reports customization from samples, providing evidence that it can support at least sample-based customization. However, the lack of ODM service means broader independent product-development customization is not demonstrated.